MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

“Grown-Up” Congenital Heart Disease and Sudden Death in a Medical Examiner’s Population*

2011· article· en· W1532631588 on OpenAlexaff
Leslie E. Hamilton, Emma O. Lew, Evan W. Matshes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Forensic Sciences · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsOffice of the Chief Medical ExaminerFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAutopsySudden cardiac deathSudden deathBicuspid aortic valvePresentation (obstetrics)Medical examinerCause of deathPopulationHeart diseaseDiseasePediatricsRetrospective cohort studyCardiologyInternal medicineSurgeryMedical emergencyPoison controlInjury preventionAortic valve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite advances in the management of congenital heart disease (CHD), children with CHD who survive into adulthood are at increased risk of sudden death. Sudden death may also be the initial presentation of undiagnosed CHD in some adults. This retrospective descriptive study outlines the spectrum of CHD presenting as sudden death in adults in a medical examiner's population. Despite its rarity (0.2% of all cases investigated between 1991 and 2007), CHD remains an important cause of sudden cardiac death to be recognized at adult autopsy. Bicuspid aortic valve and anomalous coronary anomalies were the most common malformations, comprising 36.9% and 26.2% of cases, respectively. However, a wide spectrum of simple to complex malformations can be seen, with or without prior surgery, and over a wide age spectrum. Once solely a pediatric entity, CHD is now "grown-up" and will likely be diagnosed by forensic pathologists with increased frequency in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Forensic SciencesSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207