MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Successful treatment of carbamazepine poisoning with hemodialysis: A case report and review of the literature

2011· review· en· W1532673670 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Ram Prabahar, Kalidindi Raja KARTHIK, Mohini Singh, Raja Beem SINGH, Sudhagar SINGH, Jayachandran DHAMODHARAN

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPoisoning and overdose treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbamazepineMedicineHemoperfusionHemodialysisAnesthesiaDialysisExtracorporealDrug overdoseSurgeryPoison controlEmergency medicineEpilepsyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 48-year-old man was brought to the emergency room after ingesting an unknown amount of carbamazepine. He was unconscious and not responding to the noxious stimuli. He was intubated and was placed on mechanical ventilation because of respiratory insufficiency. Primary detoxification was performed with a gastric lavage and charcoal instillation. His serum carbamazepine level was 25.6 mcg/mL at the time of admission. His computed tomography of the brain was normal. He was managed conservatively but there was no improvement in his neurological status in the next 24 hours. Serum carbamazepine level was repeated and reported to be 28.3 mcg/mL. As there was no improvement in his sensorium and the serum carbamazepine levels remained persistently high, extracorporeal removal of carbamazepine was attempted. As the facility to carry out hemoperfusion was not available immediately, the decision to initiate hemodialysis was taken. After 3 sessions of hemodialysis, his sensorium improved markedly and the carbamazepine level at this time was within the therapeutic range. He was discharged after psychiatry consultation and counseling. We review the literature regarding extra corporeal techniques for the removal of carbamazepine and discuss them in this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis InternationalSame topicPoisoning and overdose treatmentsFrench-language works237,207