Le salaire minimum: une protection supplementaire du rapport de force des syndiques?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les etudes econometriques recentes sur les decisions de syndicalisation ont commence a utiliser des micro-donnees sur les travailleurs et/ou sur les entreprises. Ces etudes ne se limitent pas aux seuls determinants du statut syndical des individus. Elles sont motivees, dans la plupart des cas, par la modelisation des effets salariaux du syndicalisme. Pour notre part, nous analysons les determinants de la syndicalisation a partir de donnees transversales relatives aux travailleurs canadiens des industries primaires et manufacturieres. En s'inscrivant dans la lignee d'une grande partie des travaux empiriques portant sur la question, nous utilisons le systeme de Lee (1978) et nous le modifions en vue de l'appliquer a un contexte ou il existe un salaire minimum garanti par la loi. Nous utilisons la variation interprovinciale des salaires minimums au Canada en vue d'une part, de confronter les hypotheses de substitution et de complementarite relatives au role de l'Etat; d'autre part, de verifier l'hypothese selon laquelle le salaire minimum donne lieu a un effet de debordement sous forme d'emulation salariale. Les resultats obtenus, pourraient etre d'une certaine utilite au niveau des politiques publiques, en particulier lorsqu'il s'agit de proceder a une revision de la legislation de travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".