MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1533170506 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n17p116

Application of Halalan Tayyiban in the Standard Reference for Determining Malaysian Halal Food

2015· article· en· W1533170506 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHalal products and consumer behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia MelakaUniversiti Putra Malaysia
KeywordsCertificationBusinessOrder (exchange)Logo (programming language)Computer scienceManagementFinanceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increase number of cases on the misuse of halal logo and questionable status of halal food has raised manyconcerns among the Muslim consumers regarding the status of halal food in Malaysia. The various reports onthe issues of fraud in halal food also indicate that there are weaknesses in the procedure of determining halalfood. In this case, an investigation on the procedures and standard reference used by the Department of IslamicDevelopment Malaysia (JAKIM) to determine halal food in Malaysia needs to be conducted in order to gain theconsumer’s trust and confidence on JAKIM’s logo. This study advocates that the concept of halalan tayyibanshould be used as the framework to determine halal products as it considers both the physical and spiritualbenefits of the food to mankind. So far, it has not been proven that the standard references used by JAKIM areconsistent with this concept. Specifically, this study aimed to investigate the application of halalan tayyiban inthe standards and procedures used by JAKIM to determine halal food in Malaysia. For this purpose, aframework for determining halal food based on the concept of halalan tayyiban has been developed. Four mainstandard references used by JAKIM, namely the Malaysian Standard MS 1500, MS 1480, MS 1514, Halal FoodManual Procedures, Food Acts 1983 and Food Regulations 1985 were then analysed based on the developedframework. Additionallly, semi-structured interviews were conducted with selected key personnel from JAKIMto verify the application of halalan tayyiban in the procedure of issuing halal food certification. This studyrevealed that the standard references used by JAKIM were consistent with the concept of halalan tayyiban. Thepractice taken by JAKIM’s personnel to issue the halal food certification also conformed to the concept ofhalalan tayyiban. It can be concluded that JAKIM has applied the concept of halalan tayyiban in determininghalal food in Malaysia. These findings help to improve the consumers’ confidence on the food determined ashalal by JAKIM. They also contribute to development of the well-being and sustainability of a community,especially the Muslim community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it