MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1533464897 · doi:10.1063/1.1471371

Giant electrostriction and stretched exponential electromechanical relaxation in 0.65Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.35PbTiO3 crystals

2002· article· en· W1533464897 on OpenAlexaff
Alexei A. Bokov, Z.-G. Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrostrictionPolingCondensed matter physicsTetragonal crystal systemMaterials sciencePiezoelectricityFerroelectricityFerroelasticityElectric fieldPhase boundaryPolarization (electrochemistry)FlexoelectricityPhase (matter)DielectricCrystallographyComposite materialCrystal structurePhysicsChemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unipolar electric field-induced strain was studied in the [001]cub-oriented 0.65Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-0.35PbTiO3 crystals with the composition close to the morphotropic phase boundary, which are known to show enhanced piezoelectric properties. Polarized-light microscopy was used to study the domain structure. In the samples containing the mixture of rhombohedral and tetragonal ferroelectric phases, a giant electrostrictive effect was found to exist after poling, in addition to the piezoelectric effect. The a domains of the tetragonal phase with polarization perpendicular to the poling field were observed. Their existence in the poled crystals is due to the elastic interactions with the rhombohedral domains. The electromechanical response of the tetragonal a domains, which should be purely electrostrictive due to the crystal symmetry, is suggested to provide the intrinsic contribution to the observed electrostriction. The extrinsic contribution to electrostriction is explained by the 90° reorientation of the a domains into the c domain state. Upon application of the driving field, the onset of extrinsic electromechanical response was found to follow the stretched exponential relaxation pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207