Systolic Myocardial Mechanics in Patients with Anderson–Fabry Disease with and without Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and in Comparison to Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is a lysosomal storage disease, which can involve the heart, mimicking hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The underlying mechanism of disease in AFD is an infiltrative, diffuse process, whereas HCM is a primary heart muscle condition with patchy distribution, which may prompt differences in myocardial mechanics. The aim of this study was to assess myocardial mechanics in AFD according to the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) compared to nonobstructive HCM (NHCM) and healthy controls. METHODS AND RESULTS: We carried out a single-center, retrospective study in a small, genetically confirmed AFD cohort, which was divided into a subgroup with LVH (LVH+, n = 19), and without LVH (LVH-, n = 21). Comparison groups were healthy controls (n = 40) and NHCM patients (n = 19). Vector Velocity Imaging was applied to two-dimensional echocardiography studies for assessment of longitudinal strain (LS), circumferential strain (CS), and base-to-apex CS gradients. AFD LVH+ patients had lower global LS than AFD LVH- patients (-14 ± 4% vs -17 ± 3%, P < 0.05), but similarly lowered global CS (-24 ± 5% vs -22 ± 5%, P = ns). AFD LVH+ and NHCM had similarly lowered global LS compared to normals, but significantly lower global CS was observed in AFD LVH+ (-24 ± 5% vs -28 ± 4%, P < 0.05), whereas it was significantly increased in NHCM (-31 ± 2% vs -28 ± 4%, P < 0.05). Unlike NHCM, in both AFD subgroups, patients lost their normal base-to-apex CS gradient. CONCLUSIONS: AFD patients without LVH already show abnormal systolic myocardial mechanics. Relevant differences in myocardial mechanics between AFD patients with LVH compared to NHCM reflect the different underlying mechanisms of disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it