MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1533994098

Ojionu Masquerade: Spirit Incarnate in Performance

2014· article· en· W1533994098 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
L. O. Molinta Enendu

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheater, Performance, and Music History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWitnessEntertainmentAestheticsIgboSpiritualityInstitutionPopularityIndigenousSociologyArtHistoryLiteratureLawPolitical scienceVisual artsSocial sciencePhilosophyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines one of the most fascinating social masquerade institutions in Igbo culture, in Nigeria. The masquerade institution is seen as an anthropological continuum, manifesting in the people’s long tradition of developed performance and festivities. The Ojionu masquerade, as an example of one of such numerous dynamic and virile masquerades, is studied as a spirit incarnate. The essence and spirituality of the masquerade; the masquerade’s physical being and aesthetics; the thrilling, exciting and vibrant performance of the Ojionu masquerade, supported by pulsating rhythmic music; the organization and management of the Ojionu masquerade, as an example of an indigenous communal cultic institution, are studied and delineated upon. The research adapts and benefits from a “source study” based on personal interviews and the writer’s privileged eye-witness account. It is significant to note that, the Ojionu masquerade, is often seen, perhaps, as the highest realms of entertainment for social occasion from a spiritually profound incarnate. The popularity and acceptability of the Ojionu masquerade remained stubbornly insuppressible aspect of the people’s cultural entertainment despite the eroding and crushing influences of foreign cultures and, the unpopular and obnoxious anti-masquerade legislations by local and municipal governments and, above all, that of the orthodox foreign Eurocentric religious doctrines who refer to masquerade groups as “a congregation of Satan”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicTheater, Performance, and Music HistoryFrench-language works237,207