MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1534021127 · doi:10.1002/0470028637.met160

The Ferric Hydroxamate Uptake Receptor<scp>Fhu</scp><scp>A</scp>and Related<scp>Ton</scp><scp>B</scp>‐Dependent Transporters in the Outer Membrane of Gram‐Negative Bacteria

2004· other· en· W1534021127 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew D. Ferguson, James W. Coulton, Kay Diederichs, Wolfram Welte

Bibliographic record

VenueHandbook of Metalloproteins · 2004
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacterial outer membraneFerrichromeColicinEnterobactinEscherichia coliATP-binding cassette transporterBiochemistryPeriplasmic spaceChemistryBiologyTransporter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract FhuA, receptor for ferrichrome‐iron in Escherichia coli , is a member of a family of integral outer membrane proteins, which together with the energy transducing TonB–ExbB–ExbD complex of the cytoplasmic membrane, mediate active transport of siderophores, Vitamin B12, and heme across the outer membrane of gram‐negative bacteria. In addition to transporting ferrichrome, FhuA acts as the primary receptor for several bacteriophages, the antibiotics albomycin and rifamycin CGP 4832, the cyclic peptide antibiotic microcin J25, and the bacterial toxin, colicin M. FhuA is a β‐barrel composed of 22 antiparallel β‐strands. Located within the β‐barrel is a structurally distinct domain, the ’cork’, consisting mainly of a four‐stranded β‐sheet and four short α‐helices. The focus of this review is an analysis of the relationship between the three‐dimensional structure of FhuA and its biological function as an energy‐dependent outer membrane transporter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHandbook of MetalloproteinsSame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207