MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W153405979

MODELING AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON HEAT TRANSFER IN SQUEEZE CASTING OF MAGNESIUM ALLOY AM60 AND ALUMINUM ALLOY A443

2012· article· en· W153405979 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEngineering and Material Science Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsAlloyMetallurgyMagnesium alloyCastingAluminiumMaterials science6063 aluminium alloyHeat transferMagnesium5052 aluminium alloyThermodynamics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study developed a solution algorithm based on the function specification method to solve the inverse heat conduction equations. By this solution, the casting-die interfacial heat transfer coefficients(IHTC) in light metal squeeze castings were determined accurately and the pressurized solidification was simulated precisely. This goal was accomplished in the four stages. First, a model was developed to simulate fluid flow in forced convection and heat transfer in pressurized solidification of a cylindrical simple shape squeeze casting. Pressure-dependent heat transfer coefficients (HTC) and non-equilibrium solidification temperatures were determined by experimental measurements. With the measured HTC and temperatures under the different pressures, the temperature distributions and the cooling behaviours of squeeze cast were simulated. In the second stage, a different wall-thickness 5-step casting mould was designed, and squeeze casting of magnesium alloy AM60 was performed under an applied pressure 30, 60 and 90 MPa in a hydraulic press. With measured temperatures, heat fluxes and IHTCs were evaluated using the polynomial curve fitting method and numerical inverse method. The accuracy of these curves was analyzed by the direct modeling calculation. The results indicated that heat flux and IHTCs determined by the inverse method were more accurately than those from the extrapolated fitting method. In the third stage, the inverse method was applied to an aluminum alloy A443 and magnesium alloy AM60. As the applied hydraulic pressure increased, the IHTC peak value of each step was increased accordingly. Compared to the thin steps at the upper cavity, the relatively thick steps attained higher peak IHTCs and heat fluxes values due to high local pressures and high melt temperature. The empirical equations relating IHTC to the local pressures and solidification temperature at the casting surface were derived and summarized. Finally, the IHTC values calculated by inverse method were applied to simulate the solidification process of the 5-step casting model. The results showed that the numerical calculated temperatures were in well agreement with experimental ones. It is adequately demonstrated that the inverse method is a feasible and effective tool for determination of the IHTC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it