Superlative adjectives, adverbs and nouns/Les adjectifs, les adverbes et les noms superlatifs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following passage describes the Winter Olympics that took place in Canada in 2010. It evokes the great enthusiasm and passion generated by this four-yearly event. Much of the action depends on the snow which, in recent years, has not proved so reliable. This almost proved the case in Vancouver, but the weather came to the rescue as the games were about to start. The piece illustrates the use of superlatives which are highlighted in bold. A few translations are provided. Some further comments: The Latin in fine has a didactic connotation with the meaning provided in the text. The expression planète bleue means the Earth, doubtless as it appears blue from outer space, as opposed to planète rouge which signifies Mars. Les Jeux olympiques de Vancouver Dans la Grèce antique, les Jeux olympiques étaient organisés tous les quatre ans près de la ville d'Olympie. Les pays extrêmement puissants ont développé des trésors d'imagination pour célébrer des rencontres sportives au niveau international. Les meilleurs athlètes de la planète bleue s'entraînent régulièrement pour battre le record mondial et décrocher la médaille d'or dans leur spécialité. En février 2010, les Jeux olympiques de Vancouver offrent un spectacle des plus exaltants et dégagent des émotions on ne peut plus intenses . Les sportifs de haut niveau entrent dans une vive compétition qui suscite les passions et les ardeurs les plus folles . Les plus chevronnés [seasoned/experienced] montent sur le podium pour afficher leur victoire.[…]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".