MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1534316947

The HOK guidebook to sustainable design

2000· book· en· W1534316947 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJohn Wiley & Sons eBooks · 2000
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Building Design and Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChecklistLibrary scienceNinthGovernment (linguistics)Agency (philosophy)GeographyEngineeringPolitical scienceSociologyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreword by Paul Hawken. Foreword to the First Edition by Ray C. Anderson. Preface. Acknowledgments. Chapter 1: Introduction. Overview. Economics. Process. The New Design Process: Ten Key Steps. Postoccupancy Evaluation. Chapter 2: Process Guidance. Cross-Reference LEED-NC Version 2.2 to Related Project Actions. Step 1. Project Definition. Checklist. Project Actions. Step 2. Team Building. Checklist. Project Actions. Step 3. Education and Goal Setting. Checklist. Project Actions. Step 4. Site Evaluation. Checklist. Project Actions. Step 5. Baseline Analysis. Checklist. Project Actions. Step 6. Design Concept. Checklist. Project Actions. Step 7. Design Optimization. Checklist. Project Actions. Step 8. Documents and Specifications. Checklist. Project Actions. Step 9. Bidding and Construction. Checklist. Project Actions. Step 10. Postoccupancy. Checklist. Project Actions. Chapter 3: Considerations by Building Type. Airports. Commercial Interiors. Convention Centers. Detention and Correctional Facilities. Health Care Facilities. Laboratories. Museums. Office Buildings. Chapter 4: Case Studies. 40 Grosvenor Place, London, England, United Kingdom. 55 Ninth Street-State Fund Headquarters Expansion, San Francisco, California. Edificio Malecon, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Government of Canada Building, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada. JohnsonDiversey Global Headquarters, Racine, Wisconsin. National Wildlife Federation New Headquarters Office Building, Reston, Virginia. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Center, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Winrock International Global Headquarters, Little Rock, Arkansas. World Resources Institute, Headquarters Office Interiors, Washington, D.C. Emory University Whitehead Biomedical Research Building, Atlanta, Georgia. San Mateo County Sheriff's Forensic Laboratory and Coroner's Office, San Mateo, California. University ofWisconsin, Green Bay, Mary Ann Cofrin Hall, Green Bay,Wisconsin. Missouri Historical Society, Emerson Electric Center, St. Louis, Missouri. Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, Denver, Colorado. Santa Clarita Transit Maintenance Facility, Santa Clarita, California. Telstra Stadium (formerly Stadium Australia), Homebush Bay, Sydney, Australia. Lavasa Master Plan, Mose Valley (Pune), Maharashtra, India. Villa Erques Eco-Resort, Tenerife, Canary Islands. Glossary. Top Sustainable Design Internet Resources. Sustainable Design Resources in Print. Index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it