MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1534554673

Brainstorming about the Future of Solid Earth Sciences in Canada

2005· article· en· W1534554673 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Paul Sylvester, Jeremy Hall, Wouter Bleeker

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesLibrary sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is a synopsis of an informal meeting that was convened in Montreal last May to discuss strategic planning for the Sciences in Canada. Five possible approaches for developing a new research program are discussed and the lessons from LITHOPROBE are reviewed. This is followed by a brief overview of existing and emerging Solid Science projects that are focussed on the Continental, Far North, Marine, and Planetary realms. There is also a section on future directions of federal and provincial geological surveys. Finally, at least two workshops are proposed to define and flesh out research themes, and identify funding pathways. One should deal with research in continental geology, perhaps using the Taking the Pulse of Planet Earth proposal as a starting point. A second should explore research opportunities for solid earth scientists in planetary science and attempt to develop funding links with the Canadian Space Agency. SOMMAIRE Le present article est un compte rendu sommaire des debats d'une reunion informelle tenue a Montreal et portant sur la planification strategique dans le domaine des « sciences de la Terre solides » au Canada. On y decrit cinq approches distinctes visant a mettre sur pied un nouveau programme de recherche, et on passe en revue les lecons tirees du programme Lithoprobe. Puis, on revient brievement sur les projets emergeants en sciences de la Terre solides et qui portent sur les secteurs de recherche sur le continent, le grandnord, la mer et les planetes. Il y a aussi un segment discutant des orientations des services de leves geologiques federal et provinciaux. Finalement, on propose la creation d'au moins deux ateliers de remue-meninges afin de definir en details des themes de recherche et de cibler des processus de financement. Un premier atelier devra porter sur la recherche en geologie du continent, en prenant s'il y a lieu, comme point de depart, le projet « Prendre le pouls de la planete Terre ». Un deuxieme atelier portera sur les possibilites de recherche interessant les chercheurs des sciencesde la Terre solide dans le domaine des sciences des planetes, et essaiera de definir des pistes de financement avec l'Agence spatiale canadienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207