Phylogenetic Analysis of Two Rabies Viruses, Takamen and Komatsugawa Strains Isolated in Japan in the 1940's
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The entire coding region of the nucleoprotein (N) gene of Takamen and Komatsugawa strains of rabies virus isolated in Japan in 1940's were determined. Phylogenetic analysis was performed on 140 lyssaviruses (128 viruses of genotype 1 and 12 lyssaviruses of other genotypes) isolated in various parts of the world, including the two Japanese rabies strains, based on the sequences of 1,350 nucleotides of the N gene. The rabies viruses were divided into 12 distinct clusters at least, reflecting geographical areas and hosts as reservoirs. The Takamen, Nishigahara, and RC-HL strains derived from the Nishigahara strain were grouped into the same cluster as the Chinese strain (3aG) in the worldwide distribution group. The Komatsugawa strain was grouped into the same cluster as the viruses from a raccoon dog from Khabarovsk, and from a steppe fox in area of Lake Baikal in Russia in a group consisting of Canada, Greenland, and the Arctic. These data along with the historical evidence suggest that Japanese rabies viruses, the Takamen and Komatsugawa strains, belong to two different clusters and moved into Japan from China and Russia, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".