Oligothiophene‐Functionalized Benzene and Tetrathienoanthracene: Effect of Enhanced π‐Conjugation on Optoelectronic Properties, Self‐Assembly and Device Performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The versatility of fourfold Stille coupling to afford oligothiophene‐functionalized tetrathienoanthracene (TTA) and benzene derivatives is described. The influence of the larger, more rigid TTA core on the electronic and structural properties was investigated. Comparative optical and electrochemical studies demonstrate a diminishing HOMO–LUMO gap as the length of the oligothiophene chain increases, with the rigid TTA compounds exhibiting lower energy gaps than the more flexible benzene analogues. X‐ray crystallography studies reveal that the thiophene‐substituted TTA structure consists of slipped π‐stacks with several close intrastack π–π interactions; no close contacts are observed for the benzene derivative due to twisting of the thiophene ligands out of plane. Consequently, the molecules in the benzene analogue are isolated from their neighbours. The thiophene and bithiophene functionalised TTA compounds were fabricated into OTFT devices in bottom‐contact configuration and exhibited mobilities of ca. 10–4 cm2 V–1 s–1 and on/off ratios of more than four orders of magnitude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".