Currency and Cultural Consumption: Lawrence Hill’s The Book of Negroes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Lawrence Hill's novel The Book of Negroes , Aminata’s slavemaster, Lindo, gives her an economics lesson, explaining the particular value of the gold guinea coin. Aminata’s realization that the coin is named after Africa and that From my homeland the buckra were taking both gold and people, and using one to buy and sell the other is a sophisticated and powerful indictment of the economics of slavery. Starting from this exchange, this article undertakes a textual and paratextual exploration of identity, currency, and the practices of cultural consumption in The Book of Negroes . Published in 2007, the novel has achieved unprecedented success, selling over one million copies in Canada and internationally. This is a notable and perhaps surprising accomplishment given the novel’s subject matter: its explorations of slavery in the Americas, and its narration of the middle passage. This essay explores the material and cultural capital generated by the novel’s popularity. What does it mean in the current global capitalist conjuncture that a novel about the slave trade has generated so much money? In the Canadian context, what might the popularity of the novel, and its narration of pedagogical moments such as the one related above, say about the nation’s collective need to speak, and learn, about its history of slavery, a history that largely goes unacknowledged in dominant national narratives? More broadly, this article also examines the cultural and economic currencies of narrating black diasporic and black Canadian histories through popular literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".