Quaternary geologic map of the Shelby 1° x 2° quadrangle, Montana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NOTE:This map was prepared to serve as a database for compilation of a Quaternary geologic map of the Lethbridge 4° x 6° quadrangle, United States and Canada (scale 1:1,000,000).Letter symbols for the map units are those used for the same units in the Quaternary Geologic Atlas of the United States map series.This map is a simplified compilation of data from many sources, listed in SOURCES OF INFORMATION, at several map scales.Some of the map data are simplified and generalized.For example, small areas of pediment, alluvial-fan, and terrace deposits (map unit pgd) that were mapped separately at larger scales by others, here are combined as single polygons.Many surficial deposits that can be shown accurately as small polygons at 1:250,000 scale are omitted here because they are too small to be shown at 1:1,000,000 scale.Map units are surficial deposits and materials, not landforms.The deposits that comprise some constructional landforms (e.g., ground-moraine deposits, end-moraine deposits, and stagnation-moraine deposits, all composed of till), are distinguished for purposes of reconstruction of glacial history.Deposits and materials are distinguished on the basis of genesis, lithology or composition, texture or particle size, and other physical, chemical, and engineering characteristics.It is not a map of soils that are recognized in pedology or agronomy.Rather, it is a generalized map of soils as recognized in engineering geology, or of substrata or parent materials in which pedologic or agronomic soils are formed.wla
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".