Bibliographic record
Abstract
Essays: An interview with Dmitry Sayenko on his hand-printed books and the state of book arts in Russia; An interview with L. Vandergrift Davala, discussing how interactive digital technologies can be used in the production of book works; Banu Cennetoglu on the project space BAS for artists’ books in Istanbul; John Bently explores his favourite post-apocalyptic literature; An essay by staff at the Media and Design Academy, in Genk, Belgium, who have been experimenting with matching ‘word authors’ and ‘image authors’ to create experimental books and ways of presenting them; Andrew Eason asks what we want from critical thinking on artists’ books; Francis Elliott of Foundry press offers some strategies for proper dissemination of artists’ books through Wikipedia; Trish Carney Schilling gives an entertaining personal account of the joys and pitfalls of the business side of her work at Indulgence Press alongside her partner Wilber (Chip) Schilling; Julie Barratt provides an overview of contemporary printmaking and artists’ books in Australia; Lina Hakim in Beirut discusses her practice around the book; Linda Newington extols the virtues of knitting and sewing artists’ books; Chris Allen and Tanya Peixoto remember Stanley Chapman - advocate and practitioner of Pataphysics by Deed; Mette-Sofie D. Ambeck examines and discusses the growth and reception of Ebooks; Nancy Campbell plays devil’s advocate for the not so humble bookmark, and last but certainly not least the wonderful seekers of lice publishes a performative text which asks us some searching questions about artists’ books practice. \nArtists’ pages by: Gracia Haby & Louise Jennison, Jordan Evans-Viney, Hanne Matthiesen, Paul Laidler, Ado Hamelryck, Julie Johnstone, Lucy Harrington, Mark Addison Smith, Tina Hill, Tony White and Radoslaw Nowakowski. \n \nListings sections of international book activity: publishers, organisations, presses, studios, collections, galleries, bookshops, journals, reference books, design, print and bind services, fairs and festivals, competitions and events. \n \nListings from over 170 artists making books in the UK, USA, Canada, Ireland, Russia, Denmark, Italy, Poland, Cyprus, Australia, Turkey, Croatia, Lithuania, Norway, Estonia, Romania, Cuba, and many more countries… \n \n258pp, black and white offset print throughout.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".