Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author looks back over the past thirty years of archival science in Québec, identifying seven milestone events which have marked its development: the creation of l’Association des archivistes du Québec (AAQ) in 1967; the Manuscript Affair in 1972; the Jean-Paul L’Allier Cultural Policy of 1976; Québec’s 1982 Act respecting Access to Documents held by Public Bodies and the Protection of Personal Information and the 1983 Archives Act; the creation of university archival education programs beginning in 1983; the creation of the Canadian Council of Archives in 1985; and the XIIth International Congress on Archives, held in Montréal in 1992. The author demonstrates that each of these events contributed elements essential to the creation of the discipline, and that in the past thirty years archival science in Québec has developed its own unique character, responds to the needs and expectations of Québec society, and continues to evolve. RÉSUMÉDans ce texte l’auteur retrace les trente dernières années de l’archivistique québécoise en identifiant sept événements-jalons qui ont marqué le développement de la discipline au Québec : la création de l’Association des archivistes du Québec (AAQ) en 1967; l’Affaire des manuscrits en 1972; la politique culturelle de Jean-Paul L’Allier en 1976; la mise en place de la Loi sur l’accès aux documents des organismes publics et sur la protection des renseignements personnels (1982) et la Loi sur les archives (1983); la mise en place de programmes de formation dans les universités à compter de 1983; la création du Conseil canadien des archives (CCA) en 1985; et la tenue du XIIe Congrès international des archives à Montréal en 1992. L’auteur démontre que chacun des ces événements a produit des éléments essentiels à la création d’une discipline en tant que telle, et qu’au bout de trente ans, l’archivistique québécoise a su se distinguer des autres, répond aux attentes de la société et continue d’évoluer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".