Bibliographic record
Abstract
Note on Transliteration Editors' Preface PART ONE: INTRODUCTION Chapter 1. The Denial, Resurrection, and Affirmation of Kurdistan -Brendan O'Leary and Khaled Salih PART TWO: FEDERATIVE POSSIBILITIES Chapter 2. Power-Sharing, Pluralist Federation, and Federacy -Brendan O'Leary Chapter 3. Canadian Lessons for Iraq -John McGarry Chapter 4. Negotiating a Federation in Iraq -Karna Eklund, Brendan O'Leary, and Paul R. Williams Chapter 5. Not to Be Forgotten: Children's Rights in the Permanent Constitution -Molly McNulty PART THREE: LEGACIES OF THE PAST Chapter 6. Autonomy in Kurdistan in Historical Perspective -Ofra Bengio Chapter 7. Awaiting Liberation: Kurdish Perspectives on a Post-Saddam Iraq -Sophia Wanche Chapter 8. Governing Kurdistan: The Strengths of Division -Gareth Stansfield Chapter 9. Turkey's New Neighbor, Kurdistan -Michael Gunter PART FOUR: IMMEDIATE ISSUES Chapter 10. What Went Wrong -Peter W. Galbraith Chapter 11. State-Building After Saddam: Lessons Lost -Karin von Hippel Chapter 12. Kurdistan in a Federal Iraq -Peter W. Galbraith Postscript: Vistas of Exits from Baghdad -Brendan O'Leary Appendix 1. Kurdistan's Constitutional Proposal Appendix 2. Law of Administration for the State of Iraq for the Transitional Period Notes on Contributors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".