Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Note on Transliteration Editors' Preface PART ONE: INTRODUCTION Chapter 1. The Denial, Resurrection, and Affirmation of Kurdistan -Brendan O'Leary and Khaled Salih PART TWO: FEDERATIVE POSSIBILITIES Chapter 2. Power-Sharing, Pluralist Federation, and Federacy -Brendan O'Leary Chapter 3. Canadian Lessons for Iraq -John McGarry Chapter 4. Negotiating a Federation in Iraq -Karna Eklund, Brendan O'Leary, and Paul R. Williams Chapter 5. Not to Be Forgotten: Children's Rights in the Permanent Constitution -Molly McNulty PART THREE: LEGACIES OF THE PAST Chapter 6. Autonomy in Kurdistan in Historical Perspective -Ofra Bengio Chapter 7. Awaiting Liberation: Kurdish Perspectives on a Post-Saddam Iraq -Sophia Wanche Chapter 8. Governing Kurdistan: The Strengths of Division -Gareth Stansfield Chapter 9. Turkey's New Neighbor, Kurdistan -Michael Gunter PART FOUR: IMMEDIATE ISSUES Chapter 10. What Went Wrong -Peter W. Galbraith Chapter 11. State-Building After Saddam: Lessons Lost -Karin von Hippel Chapter 12. Kurdistan in a Federal Iraq -Peter W. Galbraith Postscript: Vistas of Exits from Baghdad -Brendan O'Leary Appendix 1. Kurdistan's Constitutional Proposal Appendix 2. Law of Administration for the State of Iraq for the Transitional Period Notes on Contributors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it