MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P1-07-29: The role of cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein-2 in breast cancer

2015· article· en· W1536849030 on OpenAlexaff
Asma Hasan, Mousumi Majumder, Peeyush K. Lala

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchBreast cancerGene silencingCancerMetastasisBiologymicroRNAClonogenic assayCancer cellTransfectionCell cultureGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: We had shown that over-expression of the inflammation-associated enzyme cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 promotes breast cancer progression and metastasis and sustains stem-like cells (SLC), believed to evade traditional therapy and promote tumor reoccurrence. Stable transfection of the COX-2 gene into COX-2–, HER-2–, non-metastatic human MCF-7 breast cancer cell line (named MCF-7-COX-2) led to a highly aggressive phenotype in vitro, where we observed epithelial-mesenchymal transition, increased migration, invasion, clonogenic tumorsphere forming ability (surrogate of SLC) and expression of SLC marker ALDH. Furthermore, we observed an increase in the tumorigenic and metastatic capacity of the cells in immuno-compromised mice in vivo. Combined gene expression and microRNA (miRNA) micro-array analysis of MCF-7 and MCF-7-COX-2 cells revealed COX-2 induced up-regulation of two miRNAs, miR-526b and miR-655, and down-regulation of their common gene target, cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein (CPEB)-2. While both miRNAs were found to be oncogenic in functional assays, the function of CPEB-2 in breast cancer remains untested. Hypothesis: miR-526b and miR-655 down-regulate CPEB-2 to promote breast cancer cell aggressiveness and the SLC phenotype. Approaches & Results: (1) To test if expression levels of COX-2 and CPEB-2 are inversely related, we measured both gene and protein expression in multiple COX-2 disparate breast cancer cell lines. (2) We also tested if there is an inverse relationship between miRNA expression and the expression levels of their target gene CPEB-2. We found that high COX-2/miRNA expressing cell lines such as MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7-COX-2 had significantly lower expression of CPEB-2 than MCF-7 cells (low COX-2/low miRNA). (3) To test the functional effects of CPEB-2 gene manipulation in vitro and in vivo, we knocked down CPEB-2 in CPEB-2-high MCF-7 cell line. MCF-7-CPEB-2-KD cells were found to be more migratory and invasive than control cells in transwell assays. Ongoing studies are to test (a) whether there is a cause and effect relationship between the expression of the miRNAs and CPEB-2 expression, that is, whether knocking down or knocking in the miRNAs respectively up-regulates and down-regulates CPEB-2 expression; and (b) whether CPEB-2 expression is lower in breast cancer tissues than in adjacent non-tumor tissues, and inversely correlated with the miRNAs in breast cancer tissues. Conclusion and Significance: If CPEB-2 is proven to be tumor suppressor, these oncogenic miRNAs and putatively anti-oncogenic CPEB-2 may serve as potential biomarkers in personalizing breast cancer therapy with COX-2 inhibitors as adjuvant. (Supported by funds of the OICR to PKL. AH and MM are CaRTT/TBCRU scholars). Citation Format: Asma Hasan, Mousumi Majumder, Peeyush K Lala. The role of cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein-2 in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-29.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207