MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An astrocyte‐specific enhancer of the aquaporin‐4 gene functions through a consensus sequence of POU transcription factors in concert with multiple upstream elements

2012· article· en· W1536896113 on OpenAlexaff
Yoichiro Abe, Hiroko Ikeshima‐Kataoka, Wakami Goda, Takako Niikura, Masato Yasui

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsEnhancerPOU domainAstrocytePromoterBiologyGene isoformExonEnhancer RNAsTranscription (linguistics)Transcription factorMolecular biologyGeneCcaat-enhancer-binding proteinsRegulatory sequenceAquaporin 4Cell biologyGene expressionGeneticsDNA-binding proteinBiochemistryNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aquaporin-4, a predominant water channel in the brain, is specifically expressed in astrocyte endfeet and plays a central role in water homeostasis, neuronal activity, and cell migration in the brain. It has two dominant isoforms called M1 and M23, whose mRNA is driven by distinct promoters located upstream of exons 0 and 1 of the aquaporin-4 gene, respectively. To identify cis-acting elements responsible for the astrocyte-specific transcription of M1 mRNA, the promoter activity of the 5'-flanking region upstream of exon 0 in primary cultured mouse astrocytes was examined by luciferase assay, and sequences, where nuclear factors bind, were identified by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. An astrocyte-specific activity enhancing transcription from the M1 promoter was observed within ∼2 kb from the transcriptional start sites of M1 mRNA. At least five elements clustered within the 286-bp region were found to function as a novel astrocyte-specific enhancer. Among the five elements, a consensus sequence of Pit-1/Oct/Unc-86 (POU) transcription factors was indispensable to the astrocyte-specific enhancer since disruption of the POU motif completely abolished the enhancer activity in astrocytes. However, the POU motif alone had little activity, indicating the requirement for cooperation with other upstream elements to exert full enhancer activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207