Blood for Oil: Secession, Self-Determination, and Superpower Silence in Cabinda
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Charter. 7 This right guarantees all peoples freedom from colonial or other occupying influence and the freedom to determine their own destiny. 8 On the other hand, a nation's right to territorial integrity is inherent in the formation of nation states 9 -a right that prevents nations from splintering into powerless principalities. 10There are times, however, when the right of territorial integrity opposes the right of self-determination. 11 This conflict between freedom and unity is at the heart of Africa's struggle for peace, and Cabinda is on the front lines.This Note will address whether Cabinda's right to self-determination supersedes Angola's need to maintain its territorial integrity, and, if so, to what extent self-determination should be given to Cabinda.Part I offers some historical background on Cabinda and its relationship with Portugal and Angola.Part II examines the legal underpinnings of the rights of selfdetermination and territorial integrity.Part III compares Cabinda to similarly-situated regions, including East Timor, Quebec, and Biafra.Part IV analyzes the legality of Cabinda's secession or autonomy from Angola.This Note concludes that Cabinda's right to self-determination supersedes Angola's right to territorial integrity, and that the United Nations should take a central role in conducting a referendum on Cabinda's independence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".