Bibliographic record
Abstract
In March 2008, Alberta Transportation (AT) commissioned CH2M HILL Canada Limited to review and update the access management requirements for the Southeast Calgary Ring Road - Highway 201. The solutions for access management ranged from simple service road connections to reviewing possible additional interchanges to accommodate the many trucking businesses within the study area. Three government bodies were involved in the study, the City of Calgary (City), Rocky View County (County) and AT. The study morphed from a simple review to a more complex consultation process. The development of access management alternates required out of the box thinking in an attempt to find a compromise that would address as best as possible the requirements of all interested parties. The access management plan became part of the documentation provided to proponents who were preparing proposals for the Southeast Stoney Trail Ring Road P3 project (SEST). The implementation of the access management solutions presented in the 2008 detailed access management study have resulted in the further metamorphosis of several of the solutions such that they meet the changing design criteria imposed by the P3 technical requirements as well as the changing character of the areas surrounding the ring road. This paper is intended to illustrate how access management can morph from one solution during the planning phase to a modified solution during detailed design and in some cases to something else at implementation. (A) For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201309RT334E.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".