MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1537612117 · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12051

Immigration and <scp>C</scp>hinese food preferences in the <scp>G</scp>reater <scp>T</scp>oronto <scp>A</scp>rea

2013· article· en· W1537612117 on OpenAlexafffund
Bamidele Adekunle, Glen C. Filson, Sridharan Sethuratnam

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Consumer Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrganic Food and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphToronto Metropolitan University
FundersOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsAcculturationEthnic groupImmigrationConsumption (sociology)Convenience foodFood scienceBusinessSustainabilityAgricultural economicsAgricultural scienceMarketingGeographyEconomicsChemistrySociologyEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents important socio‐economic characteristics of C hinese C anadians in the G reater T oronto A rea ( GTA ) and the impact of these characteristics and acculturation on their expenditure on and consumption of ethnic vegetables. These consumers purchase ethnic vegetables based on attributes such as quality, traceable production, versatility and language. The factors that predict expenditure on ethnic vegetables among C hinese C anadians are as follows: the percentage spent on food out of total monthly income, years spent in C anada and acculturation. The estimated demand per month for C hinese ethnic vegetables in the GTA is $ CAD 21 million. Meeting this demand with ever more locally produced vegetables will reduce ‘food miles’, enhance niche market production and facilitate greater agricultural sustainability in O ntario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Consumer StudiesSame topicOrganic Food and AgricultureFrench-language works237,207