MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1537721090 · doi:10.1139/jpn.0203

Effectiveness of clozapine in neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenia: clinical response and plasma concentrations

2002· article· en· W1537721090 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pierre‐Michel Llorca, Christophe Lançon, B. Disdier, J Farisse, Christophe Sapin, Pascal Auquier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClozapineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychologyPsychiatryPlasma levelsInternal medicineMedicineClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between plasma concentrations of clozapine and its 2 main metabolites desmethyl clozapine and clozapine N-oxide, and clinical change in a sample of inpatients with schizophrenia who were resistant to conventional neuroleptics. METHOD: Thirty-seven patients (27 men and 10 women, mean age 34.8 yr) with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were treated with clozapine for 18 weeks; dosage was adjusted according to clinical response, and plasma concentrations of clozapine and of its metabolites were measured weekly by high-performance liquid chromatography. Clinical status was also assessed weekly with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Patients were considered "responsive" if they showed at least a 20% improvement over their baseline PANSS ratings. RESULTS: The mean endpoint clozapine dosage was 486.5 mg/day. There was a significant correlation between the daily dosage of clozapine and the plasma levels of clozapine and of its metabolites (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between the clozapine plasma level and the percent improvement on the PANSS. Clozapine plasma levels were not significantly different between those who responded to clozapine (n = 19) and those who did not (n = 18) and were not significantly different between patients who smoked (n = 28) and those who did not (n = 9). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the plasma level threshold (above which a better clinical response was obtained) to be 550 ng/mL. Using the total of plasma levels of clozapine and its metabolites did not lead to a better sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Our calculated plasma clozapine threshold was higher than that reported by others, but this may be related to the severity of symptoms of our patient sample. Monitoring plasma rates remains a useful tool, together with clinical evaluation, to establish the clozapine dosage for an optimum benefit-risk ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207