Differential Regulation of Exocytosis by α- and β-SNAPs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the role of SNAPs, soluble proteins that attach N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF), in regulating exocytosis in single rat adrenal chromaffin cells. Whole-cell dialysis of Ca2+-buffered solution or photolysis of caged-Ca2+ was used to manipulate cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i), whereas exocytosis was measured via carbon fiber amperometry or membrane capacitance. Buffering [Ca2+]i to approximately 170 nm produced a mean rate of exocytosis of approximately one amperometric event per minute. Including alpha-SNAP (60 or 500 nm) in the intracellular solution dramatically increased the mean rate of exocytosis. The stimulatory action of alpha-SNAP requires ATP hydrolysis mediated via NSF, because this action was blocked by intracellular dialysis of ATP-gamma-S (2 mm) and could not be mimicked by a mutant alpha-SNAP that does not stimulate the ATPase activity of NSF. This action of alpha-SNAP was significant only at [Ca2+]i between 100 and 300 nm and was not shared by beta-SNAP (500 nm), suggesting that alpha-SNAP enhanced a component of exocytosis that is regulated by a high-affinity Ca2+ sensor. In cells dialyzed with both alpha- and beta-SNAP, the rate of exocytosis was smaller than that produced by alpha-SNAP alone, suggesting that alpha- and beta-SNAP interact competitively. Although only alpha-SNAP stimulated exocytosis at [Ca2+]i between 100 and 300 nm, both alpha- and beta-SNAP isoforms equally slowed the time-dependent rundown of the exocytic response. Our results indicate that alpha- and beta-SNAP have different actions in exocytosis. Thus, the ratio of different isoforms of SNAPs can determine release probability at the levels of [Ca2+]i that are involved in regulation of exocytosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".