MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1538005935

Family Influence on Physical Activity: Exploring the Nature of Reciprocal Relationships

2010· article· en· W1538005935 on OpenAlexaff
Janelle A. Zebedee, Sandra Gibbons, Patti‐Jean Naylor

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical activitySocializationPsychologyReciprocalDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyHumanitiesReciprocity (cultural anthropology)Medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was an exploration towards better understanding the reciprocal relationship between parents’ and children’s physical activity behaviour. Social Cognitive Theory provided a theoretical framework to investigate the nature of the family socialization process. Focus group interviews were conducted with 26 children and 16 parents to gain insight into the relationship and influence between parents’ and children’s choice to be physically active. The following themes emerged: success in doing physical activity, personal choice to be physically active, reciprocal family modeling, community and culture are models too, verbal persuasion of physical activity, asserting physical activity, health benefits of physical activity, enjoyment of physical activity, and social benefits of physical activity. Findings suggested that parents perceived they influenced their children’s physical activity and that children perceived they influenced their parents’ physical activity. The authors offer ideas for the incorporation of reciprocal family influence in the promotion of physical activity for both children and parents. Cette etude explore les liens de reciprocite observes entre les comportements des parents et des enfants sur le plan de l’activite physique. La theorie cognitive sociale a servi de cadre theorique pour examiner la nature des procedes de socialisation des familles. Des groupes de consultation ont ete etablis et des entrevues menees aupres de 26 enfants et de 16 parents pour mieux comprendre les liens et les influences entre la decision des parents et celle des enfants de devenir physiquement actifs. Les grands themes suivants en ressortent : succes au niveau de l’activite physique, choix personnel d’etre physiquement actif, modelisation familiale reciproque, modeles culturels et communautaires egalement, persuasion verbale de l’activite physique, affirmation de l’activite physique, bienfaits de l’activite physique pour la sante, plaisir tire de l’activite physique et avantages sociaux de l’activite physique. Les resultats revelent que les parents croient exercer une influence sur le taux d’activite physique de leurs enfants, alors que les enfants croient exercer une influence sur le taux d’activite physique de leurs parents. Les auteurs suggerent des facons d’integrer l’influence reciproque des familles dans la promotion de l’activite physique au profit des enfants et des parents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex JournalSame topicChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207