Frogs of the Family Rhacophoridae (Anura: Amphibia) in the Northern Hoang Lien Mountains (Mount Fan Si Pan, Sa Pa District, Lao Cai Province), Vietnam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the results of own field work as well as data from the literature (Smith, 1924; Ahl, 1931; Bourret, 1937, 1942; Smirnov and Ho, 1983; Nguen and Ho, 1996; Orlov, 1997; Inger et al., 1999; Orlov and Rybaltovsky, 1999; Orlov and Ho, 2000a, 2000b; Ziegler and Weitkus, 1999; Ziegler and Hermann, 2000) and additional museum collections we identified 32 species among 5 genera of the family Rhacophoridae, in Vietnam. This estimate is derived from those species that have been examined by ourselves as well as taking into account the current understanding of rhacophorid taxonomy based on the information available from «Amphibian Species of the World» (Frost, 1985, 1999, 2000; Duellman, 1993). Adopting the higher classifications of S. S. Liem (1970); W. C. Brown and A. C. Alcala (1994) and J. A. Wilkinson and R. C. Drewes (2000) we conclude that the following genera are present in Vietnam: Chirixalus , Polypedates , Philautus , Rhacophorus , and Theloderma . In the spring of 1999, field work was conducted in the northern Hoang Lien Mountains (Fan Si Pan Mountain, Sa Pa district, Lao Cai Province, Vietnam). We found 8 species of rhacophorids previously not known to occur in Vietnam. We provide detailed descriptions of these and a description of the new species of Rhacophorus . The rhacophorid diversity for the Hoang Lien Mountains included 4 genera and 20 species. Thus the total number of rhacophorid species in Vietnam is increased upto 40 species. Small part of these collections have not been identified and, therefore, are not included in this list. Some material is represented by a single specimen and we refrain from drawing any taxonomic conclusions until additional material becomes available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".