MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539366312

OSTIV at SSA Convention

2009· article· en· W1539366312 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edward E. Hindman

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnical soaring · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational weather serviceConventionEngineeringAeronauticsTechnical universityManagementClubAerodynamicsCzechAssociate editorLibrary scienceOperations researchPolitical scienceMeteorologyLawGeographyComputer scienceAerospace engineeringGeologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 OSTIV at the Soaring Society of America (SSA) Convention 28-30 January 2010, Little Rock, Arkansas USA www.ssa.org/convention/convention.asp The expected OSTIV presentations, arranged by OSTIV Honorary member Bernald Smith (USA), are as follows*: ‘OSTIV, working for you’ – Panel discussion with Prof. Ir. Loek Boermans (President), Prof. Dr. Edward Hindman (Chief Editor and representing Prof. Dr. Zafer Aslan, Scientific Section Chair and Dr. Hermann Trimmel, Meteorological Panel Chair), Prof. Dr. Mark Maughmer (Technical Section Chair), Dip. Ing. Helmut Fendt (Sailplane Development Panel Chair) and Dip. Ing. Ian Oldaker (Training and Safety Panel Chair) Scientific Section : Meteorological: Hindman, Prof. Dr. Edward (Ward), USA, The City College of New York and OSTIV Chief Editor: ‘A weather sampler: A new handbook; Technical Soaring on-line; an on-line glider pilot self-briefing system’ Izuno, Kempton, USA: ‘One soaring pilot's forecasting methodology, case studies and results’ Rogers, Walt, USA, National Weather Service: ‘Soaring forecasts in the NEXGEN Era - NOAA's 4D Weather Cube’ Technical Section : Boermans, Prof. Ir. Loek, The Netherlands, Technical University and OSTIV President, Delft: ‘Aerodynamic developments for sailplanes at TU Delft’ Popelka, Dr. Ing. Lukas, Czech Republic, Czech Aero Club team and representing three Czech manufacturers: ‘Sailplane aerodynamics: synthesis of computational fluid dynamics, wind-tunnel and in-flight measurements’ Schwitalla, Adrian, Germany, Luftfahrt-Bundesamt (LBA): ‘Research work in cooperation with OSTIV, LBA and Idaflieg’ Somers, Dan, USA, President-Airfoils Inc. and Prof. Dr. Mark Maughmer, Pennsylvania State University: ‘A new airfoil concept’ Sailplane development: Armstrong, Dan, USA, Experimental Sailplane Association President: ‘Low cost soaring’ Boermans, Prof. Ir. Loek, The Netherlands and Dipl. Ing. Gerhard Waibel, Germany: ‘Dick Butler's Concordia, an international project’ Fendt, Dipl. Ing Helmut, Germany, LBA and OSTIV Sailplane Development Panel Chair: ‘From research to requirement, emergency landing conditions in CS-22’ Safety and training: Becker, Hal, Steven Northcraft and Bernald Smith (USA panel): ‘ADS-B/Transponder - past, present, and future’ Bertram, Gunter, Germany, DAeC: ‘‘Soft’ skills, a DAeC club training scheme’ Carlson, Richard: USA, SSA Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) Chair: ‘Ten things your instructor told you that you forgot’ Cook, Dan, Canada, SAC Flight Training and Safety Committee Chair: ‘Canadian plans for implementing flight simulator training’ Dee, Capt. Stephen, USA, SSA-SSF Trustee: ‘The Law of unintended consequence’ Deuss, Dipl. Ing. Boudewijn, The Netherlands, European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA): ‘What role does EASA play for the glider community?’ Oldaker, Dipl. Ing. Ian, Canada, OSTIV Training and Safety Panel Chair: ‘Systems approach to improving contest and club safety programs’ Ridenour, Capt. Ron, USA, SSA-SSF Trustee: ‘The Flight Review, an opportunity for learning’ Schoeberl, Ernst, Germany: ‘Sidestring’ (To be given by Helmut Fendt) SSA-SSF Trustee Panel – Rich Carlson, Burt Compton, Steve Dee, Ron Ridenour and Bernald Smith: ‘Safety and training issues - how many fatals is too many?’ *Expected dates and times for these OSTIV and the SSA presentations at the Convention can be found at www.ssa.org/convention/schedule.asp .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7590.664

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnical soaringSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207