Bibliographic record
Abstract
Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 OSTIV at the Soaring Society of America (SSA) Convention 28-30 January 2010, Little Rock, Arkansas USA www.ssa.org/convention/convention.asp The expected OSTIV presentations, arranged by OSTIV Honorary member Bernald Smith (USA), are as follows*: ‘OSTIV, working for you’ – Panel discussion with Prof. Ir. Loek Boermans (President), Prof. Dr. Edward Hindman (Chief Editor and representing Prof. Dr. Zafer Aslan, Scientific Section Chair and Dr. Hermann Trimmel, Meteorological Panel Chair), Prof. Dr. Mark Maughmer (Technical Section Chair), Dip. Ing. Helmut Fendt (Sailplane Development Panel Chair) and Dip. Ing. Ian Oldaker (Training and Safety Panel Chair) Scientific Section : Meteorological: Hindman, Prof. Dr. Edward (Ward), USA, The City College of New York and OSTIV Chief Editor: ‘A weather sampler: A new handbook; Technical Soaring on-line; an on-line glider pilot self-briefing system’ Izuno, Kempton, USA: ‘One soaring pilot's forecasting methodology, case studies and results’ Rogers, Walt, USA, National Weather Service: ‘Soaring forecasts in the NEXGEN Era - NOAA's 4D Weather Cube’ Technical Section : Boermans, Prof. Ir. Loek, The Netherlands, Technical University and OSTIV President, Delft: ‘Aerodynamic developments for sailplanes at TU Delft’ Popelka, Dr. Ing. Lukas, Czech Republic, Czech Aero Club team and representing three Czech manufacturers: ‘Sailplane aerodynamics: synthesis of computational fluid dynamics, wind-tunnel and in-flight measurements’ Schwitalla, Adrian, Germany, Luftfahrt-Bundesamt (LBA): ‘Research work in cooperation with OSTIV, LBA and Idaflieg’ Somers, Dan, USA, President-Airfoils Inc. and Prof. Dr. Mark Maughmer, Pennsylvania State University: ‘A new airfoil concept’ Sailplane development: Armstrong, Dan, USA, Experimental Sailplane Association President: ‘Low cost soaring’ Boermans, Prof. Ir. Loek, The Netherlands and Dipl. Ing. Gerhard Waibel, Germany: ‘Dick Butler's Concordia, an international project’ Fendt, Dipl. Ing Helmut, Germany, LBA and OSTIV Sailplane Development Panel Chair: ‘From research to requirement, emergency landing conditions in CS-22’ Safety and training: Becker, Hal, Steven Northcraft and Bernald Smith (USA panel): ‘ADS-B/Transponder - past, present, and future’ Bertram, Gunter, Germany, DAeC: ‘‘Soft’ skills, a DAeC club training scheme’ Carlson, Richard: USA, SSA Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) Chair: ‘Ten things your instructor told you that you forgot’ Cook, Dan, Canada, SAC Flight Training and Safety Committee Chair: ‘Canadian plans for implementing flight simulator training’ Dee, Capt. Stephen, USA, SSA-SSF Trustee: ‘The Law of unintended consequence’ Deuss, Dipl. Ing. Boudewijn, The Netherlands, European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA): ‘What role does EASA play for the glider community?’ Oldaker, Dipl. Ing. Ian, Canada, OSTIV Training and Safety Panel Chair: ‘Systems approach to improving contest and club safety programs’ Ridenour, Capt. Ron, USA, SSA-SSF Trustee: ‘The Flight Review, an opportunity for learning’ Schoeberl, Ernst, Germany: ‘Sidestring’ (To be given by Helmut Fendt) SSA-SSF Trustee Panel – Rich Carlson, Burt Compton, Steve Dee, Ron Ridenour and Bernald Smith: ‘Safety and training issues - how many fatals is too many?’ *Expected dates and times for these OSTIV and the SSA presentations at the Convention can be found at www.ssa.org/convention/schedule.asp .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.759 | 0.664 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".