Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reconsiders the significance of the performing body in Fassbinder's The Marriage of Maria Braun by supplementing the well‐documented influences of Brechtian theatre and Sirkian melodrama with the rarely examined influence of Antonin Artaud's theatre of cruelty. In this analysis, the Brechtian and Artaudian perspectives emerge as complementary, rather than oppositional, models. I argue that in Fassbinder the Brechtian distanciation effect prevents his concern with emotions from sliding into clichéd sentimentality, instead fostering the emergence of a more confronting affective dimension in both the actors' performances and the viewers' experience of the film. Through a detailed examination of Hanna Schygulla's gestural and kinetic language in two crucial scenes, I suggest that Fassbinder reconciles historical/social and affective/individual concerns by blending the Brechtian concept of the body as intelligible social sign and the Artaudian concept of the body as irrational force exceeding social and linguistic boundaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".