Bibliographic record
Abstract
As imagens figurativas fazem parte dos inúmeros objectos oferecidos e produzidos pela cultura, que contribuem para formular o modo como compreendemos o mundo e o modo como manifestamos essa compreensão. Mediadoras de representações (Frege, 1972 [1892]), as imagens figurativas remetem tanto para um mundo material, enquanto ocorrências tangíveis, quanto para um mundo conceptual, enquanto formulações semióticas. As expressões visuais, como as expressões verbais, são configurações que dispõem do reservatório enciclopédico oferecido pela cultura, em função de uma experiência do mundo perpetuamente renovada. Apresenta-se um exercício sobre a imagem figurativa enquanto signo, enquanto objecto e enquanto performance comunicacional. Palavras-Chave: Imagem; signo; performance; comunicação.Abstract Visual images are objects produced by and made available within culture, and they condition to the ways we understand the world and the ways we express our understanding of the world. As images mediate our representations (Frege, 1972 [1892]), they refer both to a material world (as tangible events) and to a conceptual world (as semiotic formulations). Visual expressions, like verbal expressions, are configurations that use the cultural encyclopaedic reservoir, manipulating a permanently renewed experience of the world. The article develops an exercise about images as signs, semiophores and communicational performances. Keywords: Image; sign; performance; communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".