MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Abstracts of the 31st Conference of the Australasian Experimental Psychology Society

2004· article· en· W1539668394 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jamin Halberstadt, Robert P. O’Shea

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Psychology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmLibrary sciencePresentation (obstetrics)PsychologyTheme (computing)Medical educationManagementMedicineSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 31st Annual Australasian Experimental Psychology Conference (EPC'04) was held at the University of Otago, the first time the conference has been held outside Australia. Approximately 180 registrants from New Zealand, Australia, USA, Canada, UK, The Netherlands, Italy, Portugal, China, and India attended the conference, making it the biggest so far. There were 166 papers presented in six parallel streams including nine specialist symposia. Topics included perception, memory, face processing, cognition, reading, neuropsychology, eye movements, attention, biological psychology, language, learning, schizophrenia, motor control, and social cognition. The keynote address, open to the public, was given by Professor Michael Corballis from University of Auckland. About 40% of the papers were presented by students. John Cass from University of New South Wales won the EPC'04 Young Scholar Award for the best student presentation. The major innovation of EPC'04 was the provision of Grants-in-Aid to assist 31 students to attend the conference. Sponsors of EPC'04 were the Department of Psychology (whose members donated time and infrastructure), the Australasian Experimental Psychology (whose members donated funds to support student Grants-in-Aid), the Assistant Vice Chancellor of the Division of Sciences (who donated the conference rooms), the School of Business (whose members donated their staff room and atrium), the Memory Research Theme (whose members supported the student helpers), the Ministry of Education (that supported the Keynote Address), and the Dunedin City Council. The success of EPC'04 was due to the hard work, the good will, and the enthusiasm of everyone involved, including the Committee Members, the student assistants (organised by Karen Tustin), John Wilden and Charlie Gilligan (technicians), Norma Bartlett (secretary), Mike Miller and William van der Vleit (computer support), and Donovan Govan (photography).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1660.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of PsychologySame topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207