Impacts of dietary protein level and feed restriction during prepuberty on mammogenesis in gilts12
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The possible roles of dietary protein level and feed restriction in regulating mammary development of prepubertal gilts were investigated. Cross-bred gilts were fed a commercial diet until 90 d of age and then divided into four nutritional regimens based on two pelleted diets (as-fed basis): a high-protein diet (HP = 13.8 MJ of ME, 1.0% total lysine, 18.7% CP) and a low-protein diet (LP = 13.8 MJ of ME, 0.7% total lysine, 14.4% CP). Nutritional regimens were as follows: 1) HP ad libitum until slaughter (n = 22, T1); 2) HP ad libitum until 150 d of age followed by LP until slaughter (n = 20, T2); 3) LP ad libitum until slaughter (n = 21, T3); and 4) HP with a 20% feed restriction until slaughter (n = 19, T4). Gilts were weighed, their backfat thickness was measured, and jugular blood samples were obtained on d 90, 150, and at slaughter to determine concentrations of prolactin, IGF-I, leptin, and glucose. Gilts were slaughtered 8+/-1 d after their first or second estrus (202.7+/-14.5 d of age). Mammary glands were excised, parenchymal and extraparenchymal tissues were dissected, and composition of parenchymal tissue (protein, fat, DM, DNA, protein/DNA) was determined. The T4 gilts weighed less (P < 0.01) and had less backfat (P < 0.01) than did gilts on other treatments on d 150 and at slaughter. Treatments had no significant effects on prolactin, IGF-I, or glucose concentrations, but there was a treatment x day interaction (P < 0.01) for leptin, with concentrations being lower at slaughter in restricted-fed (T4) vs. LP (T3) gilts (P < 0.05). There was less extraparenchymal mammary tissue (P < 0.01) in T4 gilts than in gilts from the other groups and a tendency (P = 0.13) for the amount of parenchymal tissue to be lower in T4 gilts. In conclusion, a lower lysine intake during prepuberty did not hinder mammary development of gilts, but a 20% feed restriction decreased mass of parenchymal and extraparenchymal tissues. The effect of feed restriction on extraparenchymal tissue is most likely associated with the lower fat deposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".