Bibliographic record
Abstract
MICHIGANJuncus ensifolius Wikstr.(Juncaceae).Iris-leaved or Three-stamened Rush.Previous knowledge.In North America, this species ranges from Alaska to Saskatchewan south to California and Mexico, with disjunct populations in Wisconsin, New York, Ontario, and Quebec (Clemants 2000).Judziewicz & Nekola (1997) note that Hugh Iltis found the first Midwest occurrence in Ashland County, Wisconsin, in 1971.They also state that this rush, growing in roadside ditches, is not native to Wisconsin, but is introduced from western North America.Juncus ensifolius, which is native in Montana, has a "potential for weediness" in that state and elsewhere (http://gemini.oscs.montana.edu/~mlavin/herb/ripweed.htm; accessed 2/13/01).In New York, J. ensifolius, in addition to growing along the Delaware River, occurs in a roadside ditch (New York Natural Heritage Program element tracking record, 2001).Although this species is considered native in New York and designated state-endangered, Clemants notes that it is "probably introduced" in that state.At present, J. ensifolius has no conservation status in Michigan.This species is also known as Juncus xiphioides E. Meyer var.triandrus Engelm., but according to Clemants (2000), "until a study of the complete subgenus is done, we [that is, Steven E. Clemants and his co-author for the entire treatment of the Juncaceae, Ralph E. Brooks] are hesitant to use a varietal name (J. xiphioides var.triandrus) for the widespread western taxon J. ensifolius."Significance.These collections document the occurrence of Juncus ensifolius in Michigan.No collections had been made before Voss' (1972) Flora of Michigan.Diagnostic characters.Juncus ensifolius is the only species in the genus Juncus in eastern North America having leaves that are equitant (i.e., with the margins of the blade connate to form an edge facing the stem, like an iris).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".