SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM2.5 SHIP EMISSIONS IN HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the source attribution of ship emissions to atmospheric particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter less than, or equal to 2.5 micron (PM2.5) in the port city of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. The USEPA PMF model successfully determined the following sources with the average mass (percentage) contribution: Sea salt 0.147 µg m-3 (5.3%), Surface dust 0.23 µg m-3 (8.3%), LRT Secondary (ammonium sulfate) 0.085 µg m-3 (3.1%), LRT Secondary (nitrate and sulfate) 0.107 µg m-3 (3.9%), Ship emissions 0.182 µg m-3 (6.6%), and Vehicles and re-suspended gypsum 2.015 µg m-3 (72.8%). A good correlation was achieved between PM2.5 total mass predicted and observed with R2 = 0.83, bias = -0.23, and RMSE = 0.09 µg m-3. In addition, a 2.5 times (60%) reduction in sulfate was estimated, when compared to 2006-2008 Government data in Halifax.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".