Increased intracortical inhibition in hyperglycemic hemichorea‐hemiballism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hemichorea-hemiballism (HC-HB) in uncontrolled diabetes mellitus is an uncommon manifestation of hyperglycemia. The pathophysiology of hyperglycemic HC-HB is not well understood. A previous report showed increased intracortical inhibition in the motor cortex in a patient with diabetes with HC-HB. The objective of this study is to investigate motor cortex excitability in patients with hyperglycemic HC-HB. We hypothesized that intracortical inhibition measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation, which likely reflects the excitability of cortical γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic circuits, would be impaired in patients with hyperglycemic HC-HB. We studied 15 patients with mean age 71.5 years (range, 48-94 y) and 12 age-matched healthy subjects. The motor cortex contralateral to the hemichorea was tested. Transcranial magnetic stimulation measures included motor evoked potential, recruitment curve, GABAA mediated short interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, and GABAB mediated silent period duration and long interval intracortical inhibition. No significant difference was found in motor threshold, recruitment curve response, short interval intracortical inhibition, or intracortical facilitation in both rest and active conditions between patients with hyperglycemic HC-HB and normal subjects. However, long interval intracortical inhibition was significantly increased during muscle activation but not at rest in patients with hyperglycemic HC-HB. The silent period duration is also increased in patients with hyperglycemic HC-HB. We concluded that long interval intracortical inhibition and silent period are increased in the motor cortex contralateral to the hemichorea in hyperglycemic HC-HB, but only during muscle activation. Hemichorea-hemiballism may be associated with increased GABAB receptor-mediated inhibitory activity in the motor cortex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".