Bibliographic record
Abstract
Basing his arguments on more than twenty-five years of experience with visual archives, the author focuses on issues relating to visual archives and the writing of Canadian history over the past three decades. A review is undertaken of the use made by academic researchers of images from visual archives -- primarily from the art and photography holdings of the National Archives of Canada -- in historical publications over the past quarter century; and of how some current practitioners in such fields as art history, geography, and the social and environmental sciences, among others, are using such visual imagery as part of their research and analysis. A survey of available literature relating to visual archives is included. These sections are followed by a discussion of the dialogue which must develop between archivists and other professions in order to make such visual imagery, particularly photography, an integral part of the creation of meaningful interpretations of our history and our public memory. RÉSUMÉEn fondant ses arguments sur plus de vingt-cinq ans d'expérience avec les archives visuelles, l'auteur analyse la question des liens entre les archives visuelles et l'écriture de l'histoire canadienne dans les trois dernières décennies. Il passe en revue l'usage fait par les chercheurs universitaires, dans les publications du dernier quart de siècle, des images tirées des archives et principalement des fonds d'art et de photographies des Archives nationales du Canada. L'article démontre comment certains spécialistes actuels dans les domaines de l'histoire de l'art, de la géographie et des sciences sociales ou de l'environnement, entre autres, utilisent une telle imagerie visuelle dans leur recherche et leur analyse. Un relevé de la littérature disponible relative aux archives visuelles suit. L'auteur poursuit avec un examen du dialogue qui devrait se développer entre les archivistes et les autres professionnels afin que les archives visuelles, et particulièrement les photographies, deviennent une partie intégrante de la création d'interprétations significatives de notre histoire et de notre mémoire collective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.027 | 0.056 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".