Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lack of functional Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is the primary cause of the Fragile-mental retardation syndrome in humans. In most cases, the disease results from transcriptional silencing of fragile mental retardation gene 1, fmr1, which encodes FMRP. However, a single missense mutation (I304N) in the second KH domain of FMRP gives rise to a particularly severe case of Fragile X syndrome. A Drosophila homolog of FMRP has been identified, Drosophila Fragile X related protein (dFXRP). The corresponding missense mutation in dFXRP, the I307N, has pronounced effects on the in vivo activity of the protein. The effect of the point mutation on the structure and function of FMRP is unclear, and published data are contradictory. No in vitro structural or stability studies have been performed on dFXRP. Here we show that a construct that contains only the tandem KH1-KH2 domains is a stable, well-folded unit suitable for detailed structural and functional characterization. Using this KH1-KH2 construct we explicitly test a hypothesis that has been proposed to explain the effect of the Ile-->Asn mutation: that it causes complete unfolding of the protein. Here we show that the I307N point mutation does not completely unfold the KH domain. The KH1-KH2 construct bearing I307N substitution is stable in isolation and adopts a native-like fold. Thus our data favor alternative explanations for the in vivo observed loss of dFXRP activity associated with I307N mutation: (a) the point mutation might affect intra and/or inter-molecular interactions of dFXRP; or (b) it might impair dFXRP's interactions with its RNA target(s).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".