MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1541114619

¿Sostenible? Crónica de un encuentro

2010· article· es· W1541114619 on OpenAlex
Iñaki Ábalos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePOLI-RED (Revistas Digitales Politécnicas) (La Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 7pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-fareast-language: ES; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-US">Sustainability is not only a technical problem, but also a political, economic and cultural one. The Canadian Center for Architecture has gathered experts in territorial energy management from around the world in order to have a closed-doors meeting. It is necessary to change the perception that ordinary citizens have, as Mostafavi pointed out, implying a political task which is beyond political practice. Each inhabitant today takes up double the amount of square meters to be heated, cooled, kept at constant temperature, or constructed, than 20 years ago. Some of these experts tried to show that this was a technical problem, setting maximum consumption quotas per person which would be sufficient to have sustainable development. In Switzerland, this gesture implies improving insulation, improving the form factor, and improving the sealing in joinery and thermal bridges. However, this does not stop being a local problem if we compare it to warmer climates in terms of calories and frigories, where we find 40% of air conditioning appliances. Wolker M. Melter states that there are two aesthetical models established within the general public and within professionals: On one hand, the glass bubble and the glass box, with technical knowledge providing ways to manage climate that allow for environments with a complete autonomy; and on </span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 7pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-fareast-language: ES; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-US">the other hand a return to the thick, multi-layer wall; managing the façade within bioclimatic conditions and making a return to a defensive strategy, using materials and resources with a certain degree of lightness and optimism. Recognizing reality along with its limits and contradictions is the first step towards doing something in any direction, maybe with less faith, but certainly making more sense.</span>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it