MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Teriflunomide Shows Consistent Clinical Efficacy on Severe Relapses across Two Phase 3 Trials in Patients with Relapsing forms of Multiple Sclerosis, TEMSO and TOWER (P7.212)

2015· article· en· W1541168928 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Macdonell, Martin Stangel, Matthias Mäurer, Deborah Dukovic, Philippe Truffinet, Sylvie Bozzi, Catherine Dive‐Pouletty, Mark Freedman

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeriflunomideMultiple sclerosisClinical trialMedicineTowerClinical neurologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyInternal medicinePsychologyImmunologyFingolimodNeuroscienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To report key efficacy, safety, and additional clinically relevant analyses from the TEMSO (NCT00134563) and TOWER (NCT00751881) studies. BACKGROUND: Teriflunomide is a once-daily oral immunomodulator approved for relapsing-remitting MS. DESIGN/METHODS: In TEMSO/TOWER, 1088/1169 patients with relapsing forms of MS were randomized (1:1:1) to oral once-daily teriflunomide 14 mg or 7 mg, or placebo. Treatment duration was 108 weeks (TEMSO) or variable (TOWER; 48-152 weeks, ending 48 weeks after last patient randomized). Primary and key secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate (ARR) and disability progression confirmed for 12 weeks. Additional endpoints included magnetic resonance imaging measures (TEMSO), safety, and tolerability. Post hoc analyses examined the effect of teriflunomide on 5 severe relapse outcomes: (A) relapses with sequelae defined by increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale score/Functional Score 30 days post relapse; (B) relapses with investigator-defined sequelae; (C) severe relapses by Panitch definition; (D) relapses leading to hospitalization; and (E) relapses requiring intravenous corticosteroid treatment. RESULTS: In TEMSO/TOWER, teriflunomide 14 mg significantly reduced both ARR and disability progression vs placebo; teriflunomide 7 mg significantly reduced ARR. Teriflunomide 14 mg significantly reduced annualized rates of severe relapse outcomes compared with placebo in TEMSO/TOWER by: (A) 36.2[percnt] (P=0.0011)/36.6[percnt] (P=0.0021); (B) 52.6[percnt] (P<0.0001)/53.5[percnt] (P=0.0004); (C) 38.5[percnt] (P=0.0286)/52.5[percnt] (P=0.0015); (D) 59.3[percnt] (P<0.0001)/33.6[percnt] (P=0.0155); and (E) 33.7[percnt] (P=0.0003)/35.7[percnt] (P=0.0002). Teriflunomide 7 mg also reduced annualized rates of severe relapses, although not significantly, in all definitions. Both teriflunomide doses showed similar and manageable safety profiles across the 2 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Teriflunomide has shown consistent and significant efficacy on ARR and disability progression (14 mg) in 2 phase 3 studies. Teriflunomide also reduces severe relapses as measured by several relapse outcome parameters. This may reduce relapse-related healthcare costs and increase patients’ quality of life. Study Supported by: Genzyme, a Sanofi company.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→