Credentialed Evaluator Designation Program, the Canadian Experience
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Credentialed Evaluator (CE) designation is a service provided by Canadian Evaluation Society (CES) to its members, who may elect to become credentialed on a voluntary basis. The designation means that the holder has provided evidence of the education and experience required by the CES to be a competent evaluator. The author briefly examines the impetus for the CE designation, the value it represents for the Canadian evaluation community, the development of the system including structure and administration, and how it is evolving as we learn from professionalizing evaluation in Canada. Concerns expressed during the development of the Competencies for Canadian Evaluation Practice mirrored those expressed about the development of a professional designation. The CE designation is about providing a path for new evaluators and a clearer direction for more established evaluators for their ongoing development. © Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it