MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1541382131 · doi:10.1002/cncr.29022

A multi‐institution pooled analysis of gastrostomy tube dependence in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with definitive intensity‐modulated radiotherapy

2014· article· en· W1541382131 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy Setton, Nancy Y. Lee, Nadeem Riaz, John Waldron, Brian O’Sullivan, Zhigang Zhang, Weij Shi, David I. Rosenthal, Katherine A. Hutcheson, Adam S. Garden

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineRadiation therapyFeeding tubeStage (stratigraphy)GastrostomySurgeryHead and neck cancerSequelaCancerChemoradiotherapyRetrospective cohort studyOdds ratioInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Severe swallowing dysfunction necessitating enteral support is a well known late sequela of nonsurgical therapy for oropharyngeal cancer, but its incidence after intensity-modulated radiotherapy has not been quantified comprehensively outside of small single-institution series. METHODS: This was a multi-institution, institutional review board-approved, retrospective study. Consecutive patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma who had received definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy from 1998 to 2011 were identified from 3 academic centers. RESULTS: In total, 2315 patients were included. The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging distribution was as follows: stage I, 2.1%; stage II, 4.4%; stage III, 14.7%; and stage IV, 77.3%. Among 1459 patients (63%) who received a gastrostomy tube (g-tube), placement was prophylactic in 52% and reactive in 48%. Among patients with stage III and IV disease, 58% received concurrent chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 43.7 months (range, 0.1-164 months). The g-tube dependence rate was 7% at 1 year and 3.7% at 2 years. Among 1238 patients with stage III and IV disease who received concurrent chemotherapy, the 1-year and 2-year rates of g-tube dependence were 8.6% and 4.4%, respectively. The 1-year g-tube dependence rate was 5% for patients with stage I and II disease; 5.2% for patients with stage III and IV, T1-T2/N0-N2 disease; and 10.1% for patients with stage III and IV, T3-T4 or N3 disease. On multivariate analysis, advanced age (odds ratio [OR], 1.066; P<.001), greater number of smoking pack-years (OR, 1.008; P=.04), advanced N-category (OR, 1.13; P=.049), and receipt of cytotoxic chemotherapy (OR, 2.26; P=.02) were predictive of g-tube dependence at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institution series of 2315 patients treated at 3 institutions demonstrates that modern nonsurgical therapy for oropharyngeal cancer is associated with a low rate of long-term g-tube dependence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations135
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207