MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1541673486 · doi:10.5376/bt.2011.02.0004

Bt W015-1, A <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> Strain from Diseased Larva of Silkworm with Highly Larvacidal Toxicity against Lepidopteran Insects

2011· article· en· W1541673486 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBt Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacillus thuringiensisLarvaStrain (injury)BiologyBombyx moriToxicologyBotanyBacteriaGeneGeneticsAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2005, Dr. X. J. Fang’s group from Hainan Institute of Tropical Agricultural Resources (HITAR) isolated a Bacillus thuringiensis isolate (isolate No:20050509W015) from the mid-gut of diseased and dead larva of silkworm ( Bombyx mori ) that were collected from the sericulture farmers of the region of Hangjiahu (Hangzhou, Jiaxing and Huzhou) in Zhejiang province of China. Bt W015-1 was found to produce crystalline protein toxins with high larvicidal effects against Lepedopterans. Scanning electron microscope observation showed that the strain can produce high-yielding bipyramid crystals during sporulation. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the protein is about 130 kDa in. Furthermore, bioassays conducted on the diamondback moth demonstrated that the strain  is highly toxic. The plasmid profile of the Bt W015-1 exhibited in most part no difference in size and band spectrum from model strain HD73 of Btt, but showed striking difference from the HD1 strain of Btt and Bti. The cry genotype is significantly different in cry1Ac restriction cutting sites from the standard strain HD73 of Btt. The cloned gene cry1Ac22 gene (Accession number EU282379), which encodes a protein of 1 178 amino acid residues, and it was ligated into E. coli M15, can express 130 kDa proteins that show high insecticidal activities against lepidopteran diamondback moth ( Plutella xylostella ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBt ResearchSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207