Analysis and Design of LVTSCR-based EOS/ESD Protection Circuits for Burn-in Environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As technology feature size is reduced, ESD becomes one of the dominant failure modes due to the lower gate oxide breakdown voltage. Also, the holding voltage of LVTSCR devices is reduced with operating temperature increase. As a result, during stress testing (burn-in), the risk of latch-up in LVTSCR is extremely high. In this paper, a new latch-up free LVTSCR-based protection circuit is proposed. It can be reliably used in sub-0.18 /spl mu/m CMOS technologies and burn-in environment. The proposed ESD circuit has higher holding voltage by 1.5/spl times/ than the conventional LVTSCR structure at burn-in temperature. Under 3 kV HBM ESD stress, the developed LVTSCR-based protection circuit has the voltage peak less than the conventional LVTSCR structure and GG-MOSFET by 2/spl times/ and 1.25/spl times/, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it