MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1541897644

The relationship between new transportation infrastructure and psychosocial well-being: A case study of the Red Hill Valley Parkway in Hamilton, Ontario

2010· dissertation· en· W1541897644 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roberto Melfi

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialGeographyEnvironmental planningEngineeringTransport engineeringPsychologyPsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research attempts to understand how the alteration of green space to install new transportation infrastructure has impacted the daily life and psychosocial health of area residents. Psychosocial health refers to the distress, dysfunction and disability manifested in a range of psychological, social and behavioural outcomes as a consequence of actual or perceived environmental exposure. A case study was employed using the Red Hill Valley Parkway (RHVP) located in Hamilton, Ontario. To investigate this research problem, a mixed methods approach was utilized with self-administered surveys (N=216) and in-depth interviews (N=21) of residents living within 1000 metres of the RHVP to understand how the parkway has affected the everyday lives of those living in close proximity to the road. The findings do not address specific characteristics of respondents who are more likely to report concerns with the parkway, as well the study may not represent the general population; nonetheless the findings provide us some insight into the lives of those who identify concerns with the parkway and how these concerns have affected their daily life. The findings of this research indicate that concerns are linked to distance as the majority of residents who express concerns about the parkway live within 200 metres of the road. The results suggest that the presence of the Red Hill Valley Parkway and the increase in noise and vehicle exhaust has contributed to negative perceptions of the neighbourhood, has led to an increase in annoyance, activity and sleep disturbances, and impacted the quality of life of residents. Residents experienced a number of psychosocial symptoms relating to the parkway as they no longer are able to use their home or outdoor environment like they used to which was essential for general well-being and daily behaviour. The study concludes by providing recommendations to assist policy makers in eliminating and mitigating such impacts, as well as outlining future studies which should focus on the long-term effects of exposure to transportation infrastructure and traffic on psychosocial health and wellbeing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207