Conformación del espacio urbano virreinal en la Cuenca Lacustre de Cuitzeo. Similitudes y especificidades en el urbanismo regional/A comparison of the Urban Layout of Cuitzeo Lake Basin villages during spanish rule: regional differences and similarities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El trabajo presenta un estudio comparativo entre los resultados obtenidos en la investigacion sobre el proceso de conformacion del espacio urbano en la Cuenca Lacustre de Cuitzeo durante la epoca virreinal con otras regiones de Michoacan analizadas en otros proyectos de investigacion similares que manejan aspectos morfologicos urbanos. Esta investigacion se realizo en seis pueblos de la Cuenca Lacustre de Cuitzeo, durante el periodo virreinal: Cuitzeo, Copandaro, Capacho, Huandacareo, Jeruco y San Juan Tararameo, que comparten caracteristicas fisico geograficas similares, ademas de tener antecedentes mesoamericanos que se mezclaron con aportaciones espanolas para crear un urbanismo novohispano con caracter regional. La importancia de este ejercicio comparativo es la de comprobar la existencia de un urbanismo novohispano regional. A traves de la comparacion con otras regiones de Michoacan, se puede observar que la zona de estudio, es decir, la Cuenca Lacustre de Cuitzeo, compartio algunas caracteristicas importantes con la Cuenca Lacustre de Patzcuaro, la Canada de los Once Pueblos y la Sierra Purepecha, como el proceso congregacional y la influencia del medio fisico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".