MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542308909 · doi:10.1215/ijm/1258138503

On the asymptotic behaviour of iterates of averages of unitary representations

2004· article· en· W1542308909 on OpenAlex
Wojciech Jaworski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIllinois Journal of Mathematics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsAbelian groupErgodic theoryUnitary groupLocally compact spaceUnitary representationHaar measureCombinatoricsGroup (periodic table)Separable spaceProbability measureLie groupRegular representationTopological groupDiscrete groupAlgebraic numberDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsUnitary stateTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $G$ be a locally compact group and $\mu$ a probability measure on $G$. Given a unitary representation $\pi$ of $G$, let $P_\mu$ denote the $\mu$-average $\int_G\pi(g)\,\mu(dg)$. $\mu$ is called neat if for every unitary representation $\pi$ and every $a$ in the support of $\mu$, $\slim_{n\to\infty}\bigl(P_\mu^n -\pi(a)^n E_\mu\bigr) =0$, where $E_\mu$ is a canonically defined orthogonal projection. $G\/$ is called neat if every almost aperiodic probability measure on $G$ is neat. Previously known results show that every almost aperiodic spread out probability measure is neat, in particular, every discrete group is neat; furthermore, identity excluding groups, in particular, compact groups and nilpotent groups, are neat. In this work neatness of solvable Lie groups, connected algebraic groups, Euclidian motion groups, [SIN] groups, and extensions of abelian groups by discrete groups is established. Neatness of ergodic probability measures on any locally compact group is also proven. The key to these results is the result that when $\{X_n\}_{n=1}^\infty$ is the left random walk of law $\mu$ on $G$ and $\pi$ a unitary representation in a separable Hilbert space, then for every $k=0,1,\dots$\,, the sequence $\pi(X_n)^{-1}P_\mu^{n-k}$ converges almost surely in the strong operator topology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it