MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W154254647 · doi:10.1177/070674370605101313

Book Review: Sexual Dysfunctions: Handbook of Sexual Dysfunction

2006· article· en· W154254647 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Paul Fedoroff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParaphiliaGender Identity DisorderPsychologySexual dysfunctionTheme (computing)PsychiatryDissociative identity disorderIdentity (music)PsychoanalysisClinical psychologyPsychotherapistGender identitySexual behaviorSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The book is divided into 8 major sections ("Physiological MR Techniques," "Cerebrovascular Disease," "Adult Neoplasia," "Infection, Inflammation and Demyelination," "Seizure Disorders," "Psychiatric and Neurodegenerative Diseases," "Trauma," and "Pediatrics") and into 46 short chapters.All sections are clearly written in an accessible style.Each chapter starts with key points that focus attention on the main concepts.Moreover, the editors have asked many pioneers in their fields (for example, Peter B Barker, Derek K Jones, and Susumi Mori) to write the major sections, making this book even more authoritative.The first section provides an overview of the latest MRI methods with a step-by-step approach that explains the fundamentals of each method in reasonable detail.This section is useful for beginners who are not familiar with, for example, proton spectra of the human brain, anisotropy of water diffusion, or brain hemodynamic indices.The second, and more advanced, section provides methodological approaches to quantification and analysis (for example, in MRS), in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based tractography, or in detection of regional blood flow.For more advanced readers, the first section also has explanations of the common artifacts and pitfalls in every MRI method, which are not covered as well in other manuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0960.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of PsychiatrySame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207