MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542864095 · doi:10.1002/9781118299753.ch8

Phenolic Compounds in Plant Defense and Pathogen Counter‐Defense Mechanisms

2012· other· en· W1542864095 on OpenAlexaff
Fouad Daayf, Abdelbasset El Hadrami, Ahmed F. El‐Bebany, María Antonia Henríquez, Zhen Yao, Holly Derksen, I. El-Hadrami, Lorne R. Adam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenylpropanoidPlant defense against herbivoryOomyceteScopoletinBiologyPhytophthora infestansPhytoalexinDefence mechanismsPathogenBlightMicrobiologyElicitorBotanyGeneBiochemistryResveratrolBiosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phenolics have been in the center of many discoveries on plant defenses to pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses. More recently, this fascinating group of metabolites was also pointed out as a target of invading microbes to defeat such defenses. Here, we summarize findings in several host-pathogen interactions involving the oomycete Phytophthora infestans and soilborne pathogens such as Verticillium dahliae, depicting the role of phenolics in plant defenses against them, and how they target such responses to settle their infection. The defenses described here include the upregulation of genes in the phenylpropanoid pathway, and the accumulation of phenolics such as scopoletin (a coumarin), p-coumaric acid methyl ester (a hydroxycinnamic acid derivative), or rutin (a flavonoid) in response to several pathogens. Counter-defense mechanisms developed by these pathogens, such as downregulation of defense genes and degradation of phenolics, are described as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207