L'espace domestique comme source biographique : le cas de la maison d'Alphonse et de Dorimène Desjardins à Lévis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In her study of the Desjardins house in Levis, the author brings out the usefulness of studying historic homes as life portraits and biographical documents that can offset the deficiencies and biases of interpretation. Alphonse and Dorimene Desjardins' house is a fine example, as it was there that the couple raised ten children in addition to founding and running the first caisse populaire, or credit union, in North America. The author bases her investigation on the spatial and social organization of the family. Her method is based on a study of the history of the house and the behaviour of its occupants, using various written and pictorial documents and interviews with witnesses. The subsequent comparison of the information provided by these sources with photographic surveys and material traces enables her to determine whether a given space can be attributed to a specific function. The study thus reveals the real living environment provided by this historic house. Resume En etudiant le cas de la maison Desjardins a Levis, l'auteurefait valoir la pertinence d'aborder les maisons historiques comme cadres de vie et documents biographiques afin de remedier aux lacunes et partis pris de leur interpretation. La maison d'Alphonse et de Dorimene Desjardins est exemplaire car le couple y a eleve dix enfants en plus d'y fonder et d'y administrer la premiere Caisse populaire en Amerique du Nord. L'auteure axe son enquete sur l'organisation spatiale et sociale de la famille. Sa methodologie se fonde sur l'etude de l'histoire de la maison et du comportement de ses occupants au moyen de divers textes, de documents d'archives iconographiques et d'entrevues avec des temoins. La comparaison subsequente de l'information fournie par ces sources avec des releves photographiques et les traces materielles lui permet de determiner si un espace donne peut etre attribue a une fonction precise. L'enquete revele ainsi le cadre de vie authentique de cette maison historique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".