MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1543078878

L'espace domestique comme source biographique : le cas de la maison d'Alphonse et de Dorimène Desjardins à Lévis

2003· article· fr· W1543078878 on OpenAlexaff
Geneviève Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPortraitArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In her study of the Desjardins house in Levis, the author brings out the usefulness of studying historic homes as life portraits and biographical documents that can offset the deficiencies and biases of interpretation. Alphonse and Dorimene Desjardins' house is a fine example, as it was there that the couple raised ten children in addition to founding and running the first caisse populaire, or credit union, in North America. The author bases her investigation on the spatial and social organization of the family. Her method is based on a study of the history of the house and the behaviour of its occupants, using various written and pictorial documents and interviews with witnesses. The subsequent comparison of the information provided by these sources with photographic surveys and material traces enables her to determine whether a given space can be attributed to a specific function. The study thus reveals the real living environment provided by this historic house. Resume En etudiant le cas de la maison Desjardins a Levis, l'auteurefait valoir la pertinence d'aborder les maisons historiques comme cadres de vie et documents biographiques afin de remedier aux lacunes et partis pris de leur interpretation. La maison d'Alphonse et de Dorimene Desjardins est exemplaire car le couple y a eleve dix enfants en plus d'y fonder et d'y administrer la premiere Caisse populaire en Amerique du Nord. L'auteure axe son enquete sur l'organisation spatiale et sociale de la famille. Sa methodologie se fonde sur l'etude de l'histoire de la maison et du comportement de ses occupants au moyen de divers textes, de documents d'archives iconographiques et d'entrevues avec des temoins. La comparaison subsequente de l'information fournie par ces sources avec des releves photographiques et les traces materielles lui permet de determiner si un espace donne peut etre attribue a une fonction precise. L'enquete revele ainsi le cadre de vie authentique de cette maison historique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielleSame topicMigration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical GeographyFrench-language works237,207